[mlpack] Fix MVU+LRSDP in GSoC 2018

Kaiqiang Xu rickllykqxu at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 15:53:23 EDT 2018


Hello, Ryan

Thanks for your reply. I modified my proposal based on your suggestion and
knowledges obtained from papers and codebase.

Best regards,
Kaiqiang

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Ryan Curtin <ryan at ratml.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 07:05:05AM +0800, kaiqiang Xu wrote:
> > Hi, Ryan
> >
> > Sorry to borther you directly by mistake in last email.
> > I modified proposal and emphasize approaches. Now it has been submited to
> > GSoC. Can you check it and give me some feedback  if available?
>
> Hi Kaiqiang,
>
> I took a quick look at the proposal; it seems me to like step 2 might be
> a little redundant.  You have written:
>
>   "2. Check the correctness of implementation of LRSDP.  Design several
>       special simple/hard problem, such as the Lovasz theta SDP, the
>       maximum cut SDP relaxation and etc."
>
> but I thought I should point out that we already have these in mlpack;
> see src/mlpack/tests/lrsdp_test.cpp.  So maybe this will help you save
> some time since you will not need to implement that yourself.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> --
> Ryan Curtin    | "You're lucky."
> ryan at ratml.org |  - Giles
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://knife.lugatgt.org/pipermail/mlpack/attachments/20180327/a91332e5/attachment.html>


More information about the mlpack mailing list