[mlpack] GSoC-2021

Gopi Manohar Tatiraju deathcoderx at gmail.com
Mon Mar 29 10:45:26 EDT 2021


Hey,

I agree, after going a bit through both the candidates I can see we can
unload a lot of work by using a well-implemented existing parser.
I think I should start by comparing both the mentioned libraries to decide
which one to use. I will use the same benchmark strategy that
was discussed in the issue. Does that sound good?

And also I think I can work on replacing boost spirits in GSoC then. This
will be a start to the data frame idea. Even if we are left with time
after this, I can start the work on the data frame as well. Is it
considerable?

Thanks,
Gopi


On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 7:33 PM Omar Shrit <omar at shrit.me> wrote:

> Hey Gopi,
>
> I totally agree with Ryan, using existing parser will accelerate the
> project and allow to move forward with the dataframe class. Also, I
> do believe that replacing boost Spirit with an existing parser will take
> a considerable amount of the summer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Omar
>
> On 03/29, Ryan Curtin wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:17:35PM +0530, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote:
> > > Would love to hear your thoughts on whether to go with an already
> > > implemented parser or build a new one. Also if we are planning to
> build a
> > > data frame here then
> > > maybe going with an in-house parser would be better as we will have the
> > > ability to design it in such a way that it can extend maximum support
> to
> > > the new data frame
> > > which we are planning to build ahead.
> >
> > Hey Gopi,
> >
> > Honestly I think it's best to use another package.  Not only will this
> > free up time to actually work on the dataframe class, but also it means
> > we are not responsible for maintenance of the CSV parser.  There are
> > lots of little complexities and edge cases in parsing (not to mention
> > efficiency!) and so we can probably get a lot more bang for our buck
> > here by using an implementation from someone who has already put down
> > the time to consider all those details.
> >
> > Hope this is helpful. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Curtin    | "Kill them, Machine... kill them all."
> > ryan at ratml.org |   - Dino Velvet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://knife.lugatgt.org/pipermail/mlpack/attachments/20210329/de31db5f/attachment.htm>


More information about the mlpack mailing list